LF logo
by learnformula
search
Log in
search
Courses/Law/E-Discovery Law

The Future of eDiscovery: Artificial Intelligence

Unveiling AI in eDiscovery: Navigating Ethics, Techniques, and Future Impacts

Created byLegal Cyber Academy
4.0
(1 reviews)
BeginnerUpdated Apr 20, 2024
The Future of eDiscovery: Artificial Intelligence

What You'll Learn

check_circleDefine the core concepts of artificial intelligence and machine learning within the eDiscovery lifecycle.
check_circleDistinguish between traditional technology-assisted review (TAR) and modern generative AI tools.
check_circleEvaluate the benefits, limitations, and ethical risks of integrating AI into document review workflows.
check_circleAssess the legal standards and defensibility of utilizing AI-assisted review in litigation.
check_circleFormulate a strategic framework for adopting and implementing emerging AI technologies in legal practices.

About This Course

While artificial intelligence may be causing a lot of discussion about the future of the legal profession, it already plays a central role in the eDiscovery process. Electronic discovery is an essential part of litigation, but with already large and growing volumes of structured and unstructured data that attorneys must sort through, AI can significantly enhance the eDiscovery process. AI technology can improve this critical legal process by drastically impacting how legal teams spend their valuable time, increasing efficiency, and reducing costs. It also offers numerous technical advantages, including quicker identification of relevant documents and greater insight into the subject matter. Attorneys today will want to understand how they can incorporate AI into their eDiscovery process and be confident in its best practices.

In this CLE webinar, our expert panelists begin by discussing the uses of artificial intelligence for eDiscovery, the relevant ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, and comparing the AI technologies used for eDiscovery. Next, our speakers discuss the roles and benefits of AI for eDiscovery in the litigation process. Finally, our experts conclude with a discussion of the future of legal AI and AI in the legal profession in general.

Your Instructors

Legal Cyber Academy
Legal Cyber Academy
menu_book76 courses
star147 reviews

Our Mission is to bridge the knowledge gap between law and technology professionals by educating attorneys on technology to attorneys and technology executives on its laws and regulations. Legal Cyber Academy provides a comprehensive tool and evolving knowledge base through exclusive insights from world class cybersecurity, privacy, web 3.0, forensic, and e-discovery legal and technical practitioners. Earn CLE, CPE, and CE credits. (Refunds are available if you do not receive credit) At Legal Cyber Academy We recognize that technology, the cybersecurity threats it faces, and relevant laws and regulation are rapidly evolving, presenting unique challenges and opportunities. Our platform is dedicated to empowering legal professionals with the skills and understanding necessary to navigate the complex landscape of technology in their field, enabling them to effectively advise clients, draft contracts, and navigate legal implications in a technology-driven world. Simultaneously, we strive to equip technology professionals with the legal knowledge they need to make informed decisions, ensure compliance with regulations, and limit liability. By fostering a deep understanding of legal frameworks, we hope to support technology professionals in creating innovative, compliant, and socially conscious technological advancements. Join us in our mission to reshape the way legal professionals and technology experts understand and interact with each other in a rapidly changing technical and legal landscape. Together, they will mitigate risk better, ensure compliance, and actively shape the future of technology and its accompanying laws.

Daniel  B. Garrie
Daniel B. Garrie

LAW & FORENSICS LLC – FOUNDER; JAMS – NEUTRAL; HARVARD – ADJUNCT;

Danie Garrie, Esq., is the Co-Founder of Law & Forensics LLC, where he heads the Computer Forensics and digital discovery Cybersecurity teams. Daniel has been a dominant voice in the computer forensics and cybersecurity space for the past 20 years, as an attorney and technologist. He is an adjunct professor at Harvard for Computer Forensics, and prior to Law & Forensics, he successfully built and sold several technology start-up companies. Since co-founding Law & Forensics LLC in 2008, Daniel has built it into one of the leading boutique firms specializing in cybersecurity and forensic engineering. He is a mediator, arbitrator, and e-discovery special master for JAMS and is a partner and head of Cybersecurity practice at Zeichner, Ellman & Krause LLP. Daniel earned both a Bachelor’s and a Master’s degree in computer science from Brandeis University, as well as a J.D. from Rutgers Law School. Daniel has led cyber and forensic teams in some of the most visible and sensitive incidents in the United States. He and his team have worked globally for two of the top five banks and dozens of the largest private and public companies in the world. In addition, Daniel has been awarded several patents for advanced cybersecurity and forensic platforms he built with his team, including TableTop.AI, CustodyTrack.IO, and Forensic Scan. Daniel is also well-published in the cybersecurity space and has authored more than 200 articles and books. His work is cited by Black’s Law Dictionary 10th Ed. defining the terms 'software', 'internet', and 'algorithm'. Lastly, he has been recognized by several United States Supreme Court Justices for his legal scholarship and is a trusted source and thought leader for cybersecurity articles and opinions, cited over 500 times to date.

Patricia   Antezana
Patricia Antezana

Reed Smith LLP - Counsel

Patricia focuses on managing e-discovery. With a background in general litigation, including commercial matters, business torts, and product liability defense, Patricia brings a wealth of experience in resolving a wide range of discovery issues. She advises clients regarding concerns that arise prior to litigation, including legal holds and preservation, and throughout litigation, including early case assessment, ESI protocols, collections, review, privilege issues, and productions. Patricia has been involved in all phases of litigation, including management of large-scale discovery, dispositive motions, trial preparation, and alternative dispute resolution. She has coordinated electronic and hard copy record collection and managed large-scale review projects in numerous complex litigation matters, working closely with case teams to prepare comprehensive and defensible collection and review strategies. Additionally, Patricia has written and spoken extensively on various discovery topics.

Daniel Nichols
Daniel Nichols

Partner | JurisLaw LLP

Dan is a seasoned litigator, serving clients in large and small matters and through all aspects of legal disputes. Dan’s extensive experience guiding matters from inception through all phases of discovery, motions practice, settlement negotiations, and trial provides him with a practical understanding of how to find the right strategy to meet his client’s needs. Dan has a diversity of practice areas, including construction, product liability, environmental, employment, professional liability, commercial, and consumer protection. Dan has practiced extensively in the field of Information Law, and he teaches Electronic Discovery and Digital Evidence at Lewis & Clark Law School as an adjunct professor. Prior to joining the firm, Dan was a partner at the AmLaw 100 firm of Gordon Rees Scully & Mansukhani LLP, focusing his practice on complex litigation, and he was a partner at Redgrave LLP, the country’s leading firm in Information Law, focusing his practice on electronic discovery and information governance. Outside the office, Dan is active in his church and an avid Scouter with his local Boy Scout troop, having served as Scoutmaster and merit badge counselor.

Jonathan Redgrave
Jonathan Redgrave

Partner | Redgrave LLP

Jonathan has extensive experience in all areas of complex litigation in both state and federal courts and focuses his practice in the areas of information law, which include electronic discovery, records and information management, and data protection and privacy issues. He has authored, co-authored, and edited numerous publications, including serving as Editor-in-Chief of “The Sedona Principles®,” and speaks around the world on topics including cross-border discovery, information governance, privacy, data security, and emerging technologies. Jonathan helped found, was the first Chair of, and is currently Chair Emeritus of The Sedona Conference® Working Group on Electronic Document Retention and Production (WG1). He also serves on the Advisory Board of The Sedona Conference®. Jonathan serves on the Georgetown University Law School eDiscovery Institute Advisory Board and was previously a co-chair of the institute. Jonathan also served on the Advisory Committee on the Electronic Records Archives for the United States National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and a fellow with the Academy of Court Appointed Neutrals (ACAN), along with several other trade and bar associations. Jonathan received his J.D., cum laude, from the University of Minnesota Law School and a B.A., cum laude, from the University of Notre Dame. Jonathan is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia, Virginia, and Minnesota.

Credit Information

What Students Are Saying

4.0
Student's Choice
1 reviews

Frequently Asked Questions

We are a registered provider with 327+ associations and regulatory bodies worldwide. We operate across 29 global markets including Canada, the US, Australia, and the UK. Every course page clearly displays its specific accreditations. Upon completion, you receive a professional certificate that can be validated online. Our certificates include all necessary accreditation details, credit hours, and completion dates, and are formatted specifically to meet the submission requirements of most global regulatory bodies.